tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7196175121031887724.post6690826711134821040..comments2023-04-13T07:55:06.789-07:00Comments on Amy Johnson: Why did Ex Machina succeed at the box office.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08180724081861429370noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7196175121031887724.post-33051543776231187012015-10-29T13:08:27.606-07:002015-10-29T13:08:27.606-07:00Amy,
This is an encouraging first attempt. You m...Amy, <br /><br />This is an encouraging first attempt. You make a clear attempt to explain the potential problems with the film as well as the solutions the director and producers devised to avoid failure. You also attempt to highlight the differences bewteen US blockbusters and UK film.<br /><br />TARGETS<br /><br />MAKE ALL ALTERATIONS IN RED<br /><br />P1. Rather than say the 'film wasn't very good' argue instead that it seemed unlikely that it would make a profit owing to its unusual subject matter and its lack of adherence to Mark Kermode's rules for a blockbuster.<br /><br /><br />Include details about the films release pattern (how many screens it was shown on in the US during its opening week), currently you don't specify which country these figures are for and why they altered the release patterm.<br /><br />Include details about who bought the distribution rights to the film.<br /><br />12/25 argument<br />11/25 examplesMr Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12759789197085658607noreply@blogger.com